61: Fear and Loathing in the Skies

Drones, A Void of Authority and Rising Paranoia

Welcome to new paid subscribers Peche (thanks to Rachel) and Bruce (thanks to John L)! Help out your friends and insult your enemies by inviting them to join us:

---

For over a century the skies have been a symbol of progress and innovation, a realm where technology and authority work together to defy gravity and connect the world. But what happens when that partnership falters? When trust in the systems meant to keep us safe erodes, and the air above becomes a stage for tragedy, fear, and uncertainty? Recent events suggest we may be facing just such a moment: a void of authority that threatens to turn the very act of flight into a flashpoint of chaos.

The past week has seen a troubling series of aviation incidents that underscore vulnerabilities in the airline industry and the growing crisis in our skies. The catastrophic crash of a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 in South Korea, attributed to landing gear failure and resulting in 179 fatalities, is a stark reminder of the fragility of air travel. An Air Canada flight suffered a wheel deployment malfunction, causing sparks and flames during landing, though fortunately without casualties. In another incident, a KLM Boeing 737-800 experienced hydraulic failure, leading to a runway overrun but no injuries. And of course in Kazakhstan, the suspicious case of an Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer ERJ-190 crashing during an emergency landing that claimed 38 lives.

These events highlight recurring vulnerabilities: mechanical failures tied to landing systems, aging aircraft, and maintenance protocols stretched to the breaking point. Coupled with rising paranoia around unexplained drone sightings in places like New Jersey, these incidents reveal an unfilled void in authority, that if left unaddressed, may be filled by fear, conspiracy, or dangerous overreactions.

The New Jersey Drone Mystery

Over the past few weeks, residents in New Jersey and nearby areas have reported unexplained drone activity. Theories abound. Some suggest surveillance or commercial operations, while others latch onto darker conspiracies—such as a search for radioactive material or rogue Russian weapons. Despite official statements debunking these theories, the lack of transparency from authorities has done little to quell public anxiety. Every blinking light in the sky becomes a potential threat in the minds of a fearful populace.

This situation reflects a larger global issue: the growing normalization of drones in both civilian and military contexts. Their ubiquity complicates efforts to distinguish between benign activity and potential threats, especially in regions with heightened tensions or histories of conflict.

Azerbaijan and The Cost of Distrust

The Azerbaijan Airlines tragedy is a stark reminder of what can go wrong when miscommunication and mistrust dominate the airspace. Amid active conflict, the plane was most likely mistaken for a Ukrainian drone, leading to its misidentification as a hostile entity. Early evidence points to Russian air defenses mistaking the plane for a threat, exacerbated by the region’s heightened alertness due to wide ranging and improvised drone attacks.

This tragic outcome underscores the consequences of insufficient transparency and poor coordination among authorities. Had there been better communication, the misunderstanding—and subsequent loss of life—might have been avoided.

A Broader Pattern: Recurring Aviation Incidents

The recent spate of aviation incidents globally underscores critical vulnerabilities in the airline industry and challenges to the future of authority in highly technical domains. These include:

• The catastrophic crash of a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 in South Korea, attributed to landing gear failure and resulting in 179 fatalities.

• An Air Canada flight’s wheel deployment malfunction that caused sparks and flames during landing, fortunately without casualties.

• A KLM Boeing 737-800’s hydraulic failure that led to a runway overrun, also without injuries.

Common threads in these incidents such as mechanical failures related to landing systems, the involvement of older aircraft, and their close temporal proximity all raise questions about maintenance protocols, workforce challenges, and the effectiveness of existing safety measures.

One significant factor is the labor shortage in the aviation industry, particularly in maintenance roles. Airlines and regulatory bodies alike have struggled to keep up with the demand for skilled technicians and inspectors. Boeing, the manufacturer of several aircraft involved in these incidents, has faced scrutiny over its production and maintenance standards, especially as it relies on an overburdened workforce to inspect aging fleets.

The consequences of these shortages are stark: rushed inspections, deferred maintenance, and missed signs of wear or failure that could lead to catastrophic outcomes. This pressure is compounded by economic challenges faced by airlines, which often prioritize profitability over redundancy in safety protocols. For an industry that relies so heavily on both human expertise and mechanical reliability, the growing gap in workforce capacity creates a void, one that risks being filled by human error, technological shortcuts, or diminished safety standards.

Could New Jersey Become the Next Azerbaijan?

The danger is not hypothetical. If paranoia continues to escalate, it’s not difficult to imagine a scenario where civilians or local authorities act rashly. A simple misunderstanding, like a hobbyist drone mistaken for something more sinister, or a small aircraft misidentified as a threat, could spiral into tragedy. Imagine a trigger-happy civilian with a rifle taking aim at the skies, or local law enforcement making snap decisions based on incomplete information. The fatal potential is all too real.

The growing fear, uncertainty, and doubt around aerial phenomena resemble the conditions that led to the tragedy in Azerbaijan. While one most likely involved state-sanctioned military action, the other could arise from unchecked paranoia and mistrust (not that these are mutually exclusive). These reactions thrive in the absence of clear authority, leaving a vacuum where fear dictates decisions.

The skies are becoming more crowded, not just with planes and drones but with the fears and suspicions of a public increasingly unsure of what to believe. The tragedy in Azerbaijan highlights the fatal cost of mistaken identity in the air, while the paranoia in New Jersey offers a glimpse of how such misunderstandings might unfold in other contexts.

Without systemic change to address workforce shortages, improve mechanical oversight, and rebuild public trust, the void of authority in aviation will only grow. And as history has shown, such voids rarely remain empty—they are filled by something, often to the detriment of safety and stability. The question is whether we can collectively act to ensure that what fills this void restores trust and resilience, rather than amplifying fear and chaos.

Liking the issues you like and posting comments directly influences what we publish and where our focus goes! ❤